Facebook and Microsoft both said they pay men and women virtually the same in announcements made on the eve of Equal Pay Day, which marks how long into the new year women have to keep working to catch up to what men were paid last year.
As is common, the companies are comparing men and women who do the same work.
“Today, for every $1 earned by men, our female employees in the U.S. earn 99.8 cents at the same job title and level,” Microsoft head of human resources Kathleen Hogan wrote in a blog post. Facebook’s head of people Lori Matloff Goler made a similar announcement in a post on the social-media network, writing that the company does a “thorough statistical analyses to compare the compensation of men and women performing similar work” and they “earn the same.”
Microsoft and Facebook are just the latest in a string of companies to talk more about gender pay equity after facing pressure from activist shareholders. Boutique investment firm Arjuna Capital has filed proposals with nine tech giants this shareholder season, asking them to commit to fighting gender-pay gaps and disclose salary information. Several other targets of the campaign, including Apple and Amazon, addressed the issue earlier this year.
And there could be more who decide to come forward. Arjuna’s Natasha Lamb, its director of equity research and shareholder engagement, says it has had interest from other investors who might like to take part in such efforts. Meanwhile, consultants who help companies audit their compensation for pay disparities are seeing increased demand.
Gail Greenfield, a principal at the consulting firm Mercer, says she’s begun getting cold calls from organizations that aren’t already clients about helping with the issue, which she says is unusual. “They’re saying, ‘my boss said I need to look at this, can I talk to you immediately?’ ” Greenfield says. “It was literally like this emergency email.”
Companies, especially those that do federal contracting, have long audited their compensation for disparities, Greenfield says. But new regulatory changes, combined with more public attention on the issue, are driving interest. California’s recent Fair Pay Act requires that companies be able to prove they pay men and women equally for similar jobs. And earlier this year, President Obama proposed new rules that would require larger companies to report salary data based on race, gender and ethnicity to the Equal Employment Opportunity Commission.
But while more companies may be reporting a lack of a gender pay gap, comparing people doing the same work doesn’t tell the full story of how women struggle to get ahead in tech. For one, it ignores a more pernicious problem: The industry’s position gap. While men and women may end up earning roughly the same amount in the same jobs, men are more likely to end up in higher-paying roles in the tech industry.
“It’s accurate for what it claims to be — a lack of a pay gap when looking at the same jobs — but it doesn’t get at the broader issue of women being underrepresented in these fields and leadership positions that are so crucial for setting the tone for the whole company,” said Lisa Maatz, vice president of government relations at the American Association of University Women.
Last year, long-running tech career site Dice reported that that men were much more likely to hold better paying tech job titles than women. While average salaries for the top 10 tech positions held by men in 2014 ranged from $92,245 to $127,750, the top ten roles held by women had average pay of $43,068 to $98,328.
And both Facebook and Microsoft have far fewer women in leadership roles than men. Women make up 23 percent of Facebook’s senior leadership, according to its latest diversity report. Microsoft’s diversity report shows an even larger gap, with women holding just 17.3 percent of leadership roles.
Meanwhile, Greenfield says, her own experience is that the kind of aggregate percentages these companies are reporting can end up masking pockets in an organization where there are bigger gaps between what men and women earn, even among job titles. In her work with clients, she finds that even after doing a rigorous statistical analysis that accounts for things like job categories, levels, experience or location, the overall company figure may be north of 99 percent, but there are places in the organization where a wider gap remains. “It’s not that it’s not true, but it’s not telling the whole story,” she says.
(A Facebook spokesperson said in an email that its analysis of gender differences in compensation includes job profile, job level and location: “This is widely accepted practice in pay equity analysis.” Microsoft, Apple and Amazon either declined to comment or did not immediately respond to a request for comment.)
Arjuna’s Lamb actually applauds the disclosure by GoDaddy, the domain name registrar known for its controversial Super Bowl ads, which chose to break out the gender pay gap across levels of the company when it shared its data last October. Across the total company, for instance, it found that women are actually paid 0.28 percent more than men, while in management roles, women are paid 3.58 percent less. “I think that’s the kind of transparency we’re shooting for here,” she says.
AAUW’s Maatz says there’s room for even more transparency. “I’d love to see the studies be released, not only so they can back everything up, but also so they can be a model for other companies that want to do this kind of analysis,” she said.
Jena McGregor writes a daily column analyzing leadership in the news for the Washington Post’s On Leadership section.
Andrea Peterson covers technology policy for The Washington Post, with an emphasis on cybersecurity, consumer privacy, transparency, surveillance and open government.